Skip to main content
All Guides
Delivery

SDLC Process Guide: Phases, Methodologies, and How to Improve Yours

The Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) is the foundation of how software gets built. Learn the phases, compare methodologies, and find where your process is broken.

11 min readUpdated January 8, 2026By CodePulse Team
SDLC Process Guide: Phases, Methodologies, and How to Improve Yours - visual overview

SDLC—Software Development Life Cycle—is the structured process teams use to build software. Whether you follow Waterfall, Agile, or something in between, understanding SDLC phases helps you identify bottlenecks and improve your delivery process. This guide explains the modern SDLC, how to measure each phase, and where most teams get stuck.

"The SDLC isn't a process to follow—it's a lens for understanding where value gets stuck on its way to customers."

What is SDLC?

The Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) is a framework that describes the phases software goes through from concept to retirement. Every software project follows some version of this cycle, whether explicitly or not.

The classic SDLC phases are:

  1. Planning — Define goals, scope, and feasibility
  2. Requirements — Gather and document what needs to be built
  3. Design — Architect the solution
  4. Development — Write the code
  5. Testing — Verify it works correctly
  6. Deployment — Release to production
  7. Maintenance — Support, fix bugs, iterate
The Software Development Life Cycle

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                                                                 │
│   Planning → Requirements → Design → Development → Testing →   │
│                                                                 │
│                        ↓                                        │
│                                                                 │
│              ← ← ← Deployment → Maintenance → → →              │
│                        │                                        │
│                        │ (feedback loop)                        │
│                        ▼                                        │
│                   Back to Planning                              │
│                                                                 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

SDLC Methodologies

Different methodologies implement the SDLC differently. The methodology you choose affects how work flows through these phases:

MethodologyHow Phases WorkBest For
WaterfallSequential phases; complete one before starting nextFixed scope, regulatory requirements
AgileIterative cycles; all phases in every sprintEvolving requirements, fast feedback
DevOpsContinuous; phases overlap and automateHigh deployment frequency, SaaS products
LeanMinimal viable phases; eliminate wasteStartups, experimental features
SpiralRisk-driven iterations through phasesLarge, high-risk projects

/// Our Take

The debate over "which SDLC methodology is best" misses the point. All of them work when applied correctly—and all of them fail when applied dogmatically.

Focus less on methodology labels and more on flow: How long does it take for a good idea to reach customers? Where does work get stuck? That's what matters— not whether you're "doing Agile correctly."

The Modern SDLC in Practice

In modern software teams, especially those practicing DevOps and continuous delivery, the SDLC phases often overlap and happen in parallel:

1. Ideation & Planning

Ideas come from customers, stakeholders, or the team. This phase includes:

  • Problem definition and user research
  • Feasibility assessment
  • Prioritization against other work
  • Rough scoping and resource allocation

Common bottleneck: Too many ideas, unclear priorities. Work sits in "planning" indefinitely.

2. Requirements & Design

Define what to build and how. Modern teams often combine these:

  • User stories or PRDs (Product Requirement Documents)
  • Technical design docs for complex features
  • API contracts and schema definitions
  • Wireframes or prototypes for UX

Common bottleneck: Over-documentation. Spending weeks on specs for features that take days to build.

3. Development

Writing code. In modern teams, this phase is highly measurable:

  • Coding time (first commit to PR opened)
  • PR size and complexity
  • Branch lifetime
  • WIP (Work in Progress) limits

Common bottleneck: Context switching. Developers juggling too many things, none making progress.

Identify bottlenecks slowing your team with CodePulse

4. Code Review & Testing

Verifying quality before merging. This is where many teams lose the most time:

  • Wait for review (PR sits waiting for attention)
  • Review time (reviewer examining code)
  • Iteration (address feedback, re-review)
  • Automated testing (CI pipeline)

Common bottleneck: Review pickup time. PRs wait hours or days before anyone looks at them.

5. Deployment

Getting code to production. Modern practices minimize this phase:

  • Continuous Integration (CI) — Automated builds and tests
  • Continuous Deployment (CD) — Automated releases
  • Feature flags — Deploy without releasing
  • Canary releases — Gradual rollout

Common bottleneck: Manual deployment processes. Waiting for "deployment windows" instead of shipping when ready.

6. Monitoring & Maintenance

Post-deployment observation and iteration:

  • Production monitoring and alerting
  • Bug fixes and incident response
  • Performance optimization
  • Feature iteration based on feedback

Common bottleneck: Bug-fixing dominates. Teams spend so much time on bugs they never ship new features.

📊 How to See This in CodePulse

CodePulse measures the Development → Review → Deployment phases automatically:

  • Cycle Time Breakdown shows time spent in Coding, Waiting, Review, and Merge phases
  • Deployment Frequency tracks how often you ship
  • Review Network reveals bottlenecks in the review phase

Measuring Each SDLC Phase

"You can't improve what you don't measure. But measuring the wrong things makes them worse, not better."

Here are meaningful metrics for each SDLC phase:

PhaseMetricWhat It Tells You
PlanningIdea-to-start timeHow long ideas wait before work begins
RequirementsSpec churn rateHow often requirements change mid-development
DevelopmentCoding time, WIP countHow long active coding takes, multitasking level
ReviewPickup time, review timeWait time for reviews, time spent reviewing
TestingTest coverage, failure rateQuality of automated testing
DeploymentDeployment frequency, lead timeHow often you ship, time from commit to production
MaintenanceChange failure rate, MTTRHow often deploys cause issues, recovery time

SDLC Process Improvement

Improving your SDLC means finding and eliminating bottlenecks. Here's a systematic approach:

Step 1: Map Your Current Flow

Document how work actually flows through your process (not how it's supposed to flow):

Example: Current SDLC Flow Analysis

Phase               Avg Time    Wait Time    % of Total
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Ideation            -           14 days      -
Requirements        3 days      5 days       16%
Development         4 days      1 day        10%
Code Review         1 day       3 days       8%   ← Most wait here
Testing             0.5 days    0.5 days     2%
Deployment          0.5 days    2 days       5%   ← Manual process
Maintenance         ongoing     -            -

Total Lead Time: ~33 days (14 days just waiting for review/deploy)

Step 2: Identify Biggest Bottleneck

Focus on the phase with the most wait time. In the example above, it's code review (3 days waiting) and deployment (2 days waiting).

Step 3: Apply Targeted Fixes

BottleneckPotential Fixes
Long planning queuesReduce WIP limits, say no more often, improve prioritization
Requirements churnSmaller batches, earlier user feedback, spike prototypes
Slow codingReduce context switching, protect focus time, improve tooling
Review delaysReview SLAs, smaller PRs, dedicated review time blocks
Test failuresFix flaky tests, improve coverage, faster test runs
Deployment frictionAutomate with CI/CD, remove approval gates, use feature flags
High bug rateMore testing, better monitoring, smaller releases

Step 4: Measure Impact

After implementing fixes, measure again. Did lead time decrease? Did the bottleneck move to a different phase?

SDLC Anti-Patterns

Common mistakes that slow down software delivery:

1. Big Bang Releases

Saving up changes for quarterly releases creates risk. Smaller, more frequent releases are safer and provide faster feedback.

2. Handoff Culture

When phases are owned by different teams (dev → QA → ops), handoffs create delays. Cross-functional teams that own the full cycle are faster.

3. Over-Process

Approval gates, change advisory boards, and heavyweight documentation slow teams without proportional safety benefits. Automate checks where possible.

4. Under-Investment in Automation

Manual testing, manual deployments, and manual code reviews don't scale. Every repetitive task is a candidate for automation.

5. Invisible Work in Progress

Without visibility into WIP, teams overcommit. Visualize all work in progress— not just development, but reviews waiting, deployments queued, bugs triaged.

"The goal isn't to follow the SDLC perfectly—it's to ship valuable software to users as quickly and safely as possible."

Conclusion

The SDLC is a framework for understanding how software gets built—not a set of rules to follow rigidly. The best teams:

  • Understand their actual flow—not the idealized version
  • Measure each phase—especially wait time between phases
  • Attack bottlenecks systematically—one at a time
  • Automate repetitive work—especially testing and deployment
  • Iterate continuously—the SDLC itself should evolve

Start by mapping your current flow. Where does work wait? That's your first improvement target. Use tools like CodePulse to measure the phases you can see in Git data—coding, review, and deployment. Then work backward from there to planning and forward to maintenance.

See these insights for your team

CodePulse connects to your GitHub and shows you actionable engineering metrics in minutes. No complex setup required.

Free tier available. No credit card required.